bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel D5400XS
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090724
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '21 at 20:27
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 44 User benchmarks, average bench 52% J6PR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 44.9 2-Core 90.5 43% 67.3 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 313 30% 246 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 72 72 82 78 67 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47% Average	Read 240 Write 107 Mixed 138 SusWrite 75 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 23.3 86% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 79.6 DQ Mixed 116 92% 133 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 133%
Freenas iSCSI Disk 215GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 189GB free Firmware: 0123 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 32 46 48 49 66 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 51.3 Write 44.7 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 44.6 32% 43.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 4.6 713% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 28%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1GB free Firmware: 01.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 49.1 Write 46.8 Mixed 35.6 33% 43.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB 7,087 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 338GB free Firmware: 04.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 97 98 98 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 53.1 Write 56.1 Mixed 47.4 SusWrite 98.4 47% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 7.3 18% 6.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	6	5	64	0"	1028 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,033x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,576x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	938x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	377x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16