| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 500-110et (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2AF7 |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130905 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 05 '21 at 22:08 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.9%
Good
|
73% 128 Pts
|
54% 439 Pts
|
34% 558 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.4%
Poor
|
27% 33.7 fps
|
25% 31.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 189 208 188 177 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
45% 201 MB/s
|
109% 36.8 MB/s
|
126% 168 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 1TB
271GB free
Firmware: RVT42B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 452 455 465 459 460 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
102% 450 MB/s
|
138% 46.5 MB/s
|
263% 347 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer 34GB
4GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 8.3 8.7 9.8 9.4 9.9 MB/s
|
3.29%
Terrible
|
6% 4.62 MB/s
|
10% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
54.1%
Above average
|
53% 18.7 GB/s
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
46% 87.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 500-110et Builds (Compare 9 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 500-110et
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 645NvidiaBench 9%, 4,869 samples | 5x |
| GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples | 1x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 101% - Outstanding | Total price: $75 |