HP Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR 3664h
Memory3.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '17 at 04:21
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 83.8
43% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 83.4
8-Core 83.3
11% 83.4 Pts
64-Core 84.1
5% 84.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
248GB free
Firmware: HP35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 22.4
Write 89.9
Mixed 30.5
35% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.63
133% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3402111AS 40GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ADH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 42.6
Write 39.8
Mixed 39.8
31% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.35
73% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1810ED48E7F1333 RMR1810ED48E7F1333 RMR1810ED48E7F1333 RMR1810ED48E7F1333 4GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback