Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 550P5C/550P7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550P5C-S05CL
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, , 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 15:05
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 85.2
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 93.5
54% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 238
27% 212 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 82.5
53% 70.3 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 40.4
44% 56.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 56%
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_FCCT256M550SSD1 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 113 82 88 75 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 428
Write 436
Mixed 295
SusWrite 118
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 24.2
79% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 190
144% 194 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 113%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
278GB free
Firmware: JA2OA450
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 63 73 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43% Average
Read 79.2
Write 77.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 71
45% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550P5C/550P7C Builds (Compare 602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback