Toshiba Satellite S55t-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite S55t-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF50 06F4
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 20:57
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 182
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 533
56% 447 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Toshiba(1179 F84A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 17
Parallax 17.9
17% 18.6 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 18
15% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 69 65 65 54 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 475
Write 85
Mixed 126
SusWrite 61.6
40% 187 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 28.4
131% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 125
117% 190 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72%
Great: 89%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
731GB free
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 103 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 104
61% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 16.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite S55t-C Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite S55t-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback