Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 19:29
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 75.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 974
91% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,155
72% 1,155 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1426 MHz, MLim: 2092 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.45.01.26
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 88.1
53% 73.1 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 49.7
50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1633 1696 1694 1771 1742 1318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,545
Write 1,990
Mixed 1,720
SusWrite 1,642
442% 1,974 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 52.3
177% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 203
187% 302 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 272%
Great: 435%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$150
997GB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 392 388 398 424 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 510
Write 440
Mixed 410
SusWrite 393
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 35.5
118% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 153
116% 159 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 4133 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 27.8
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,048
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback