Asrock Q1900-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Q1900-ITX (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '17 at 12:12
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 6,116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 72.9 1-Core 22.7 2-Core 43.7 34% 46.4 Pts	4-Core 60.1 8-Core 72.8 9% 66.4 Pts	64-Core 84.6 5% 84.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0F31) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.93% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 1 1% 1.05 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.93% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 480GB-$180 3,042 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 262GB free Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1110 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2166 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1544 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 35 100 55837720611 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1544 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 184105 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 68 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 184105 (F2) Unknown 100 100 393593 (F9) Unknown 100 100 45666	49.1% Average	Read 357 Write 232 Mixed 232 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 15 58% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 67.3 DQ Write 61 DQ Mixed 35.3 34% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 69%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 1417 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2081 (A5) Unknown 100 100 476862611652 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 290 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 47 41 253403070517 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 279175168065 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 584 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1427 (F1) Unknown 253 253 919 (F2) Unknown 253 253 909 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	31.3% Below average	Read 177 Write 189 Mixed 268 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 3.01 41% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 15.4 DQ Write 42.1 DQ Mixed 6.03 11% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 238GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 138 3975 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3053 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1897 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1820 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 99 2 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BE) vendor-specific 58 51 707395626 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 270 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2784 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.7% Above average	Read 101 Write 103 Mixed 102 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.44 101% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G3S1339M.M16FED CT8G3S1339M.M16FN 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.2% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 10.6 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q1900-ITX Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900-ITX

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	43x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	43x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	4x
Solid State Disk 60GBSpccBench 52%, 2,308 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	5x
CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GBCrucialBench 38%, 4,853 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16