Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150918
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '21 at 22:25
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 193 67% 120 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 249 33% 245 Pts	64-Core 245 15% 245 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 5.9 3% 3.93 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.2 4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 3%
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.4% Average	Lighting 53.4 Reflection 56.7 Parallax 71.7 44% 60.6 fps	MRender 51.6 Gravity 51.4 Splatting 37.2 37% 46.7 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 287 267 277 273 281 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 353 Write 292 Mixed 216 SusWrite 280 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 79.9 4K Mixed 21.4 90% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 232 202% 302 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 154GB free Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 154 190 172 182 158 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 319 Write 222 Mixed 262 SusWrite 175 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 26.5 97% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 201 157% 214 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 617GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 92 94 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	60% Good	Read 117 Write 112 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 91.7 69% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 16GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	46.7% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 14.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	137x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	99x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	97x

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $817

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16