Zotac ZBOX-EN760

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 69% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Zotac ZBOX-EN760 (all builds)
Motherboard	ZOTAC ZBOX-EN760
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140617
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 16 '17 at 05:03
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	69%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281 64,450 User benchmarks, average bench 43% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 82.1 1-Core 76.9 2-Core 121 58% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 181 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M 18,736 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Zotac(19DA B230) 2GB CLim: 1097 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 20.3 17% 18.8 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 15.7 16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB 3,936 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1991 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 8 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 43 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 863035558	87.6% Excellent	Read 487 Write 402 Mixed 414 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 21.6 111% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 17.4 74% 167 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 128%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 896GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 92 92 2514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 306 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 125 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 45 (BF) G-sense error rate 252 252 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 59 56 193274904617 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 7 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1310	59.8% Above average	Read 101 Write 107 Mixed 108 80% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.33 98% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 59%
Corsair Voyager GS 253GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 196GB free, PID 1a0d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 234 Write 48.7 Mixed 53.8 106% 112 MB/s	4K Read 7.47 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 1.25 102% 3.22 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 102%
SDHC Card 4GB 2,629 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	6.46% Terrible	Read 20.9 Write 8.7 Mixed 11.6 16% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.28 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 24% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.46% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.T16 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 16GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 18.4 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 19.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZBOX-EN760 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Zotac ZBOX-EN760

CPU
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	13x

SSD
850 EVO mSATA 250GBSamsungBench 95%, 4,026 samples	2x
M550 mSATA 256GBCrucial $398Bench 87%, 658 samples	2x
MKNSSDAT240GB-DX 240GBMushkinBench 61%, 135 samples	1x

RAM
99U5428-018.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 51%, 4,502 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 10,168 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,963 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16