bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System
Motherboard	Intel DG41WV
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101111
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '17 at 19:50
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	49%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron E3400-$19 3,809 User benchmarks, average bench 35% PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 56.9 1-Core 29.2 2-Core 45 31% 43.7 Pts	4-Core 48.6 8-Core 34.5 6% 41.5 Pts	64-Core 66.2 4% 66.2 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 372.90 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 67.1 Reflection 65.4 Parallax 57.5 55% 63.3 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 66.6 Splatting 66.5 56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 64414969 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 44693429687482 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1101 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 520 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 60 73018376225 (C2) HDA temperature 33 60 73018376225 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 64414969 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 64414969 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 64414969 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9476 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5895 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5895 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7417	36.7% Below average	Read 209 Write 152 Mixed 152 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 8.88 57% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 85.9 DQ Mixed 10 21% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 81GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 189642852 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 206 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 29578003 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27551 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 149 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 52 605683740 (C2) HDA temperature 28 48 68719476764 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 38 28 189642852 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -126014340436796 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2449300869 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1995623768	55.3% Above average	Read 94 Write 98.5 Mixed 94.7 72% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.53 124% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 74%
Corsair Voyager GS 253GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 192GB free, PID 1a0d, Voyager gt Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 27.9 Mixed 15.7 30% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.99 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.5 47% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 2.5 8% 3 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,027x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,573x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	936x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,044x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16