Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 92 2-Core 184 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 461 46% 376 Pts	64-Core 467 29% 467 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0493) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2598 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.23% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 1.16 1% 1.45 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.39 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.23% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB 2,059 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: O061 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	65% Good	Read 467 Write 149 Mixed 214 60% 277 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 24.1 100% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 83.3 DQ Mixed 58.7 69% 123 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 422GB free Firmware: JC45 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 117 Write 117 Mixed 56.2 71% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.49 105% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 435GB free Firmware: JC45 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 120 Mixed 39.1 69% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.6 134% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1TB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 26.3 Mixed 11.3 27% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.31 48% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GB 13,591 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 14.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 13.9 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	22x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	6x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	4x

RAM
HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 CT102464BA160B.C16 CT102464BA160B.C16 Unifosa HU564403EP0200 21GBHynixBench 44%, 5 samples	5x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	4x
9905403-559.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 480 samples	4x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $285

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16