Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 03:13
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 289
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 883
86% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,325
82% 1,325 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 102
Reflection 103
Parallax 91.3
83% 98.9 fps
Gravity 94.4
Splatting 97.3
85% 95.9 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1210 890 886 889 882 873 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,256
Write 2,088
Mixed 1499
SusWrite 938
379% 1,695 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 57
206% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 838
613% 799 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 246%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
9GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 445
Write 229
Mixed 213
65% 296 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 50.1
145% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
0GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 3.7
6% 4.63 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 40%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
10GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 25 28 21 14 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 19.5
Write 39.2
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 18.9
35% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 50%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
5GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 21.3
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 1.3
15% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 40%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
16GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 19 21 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.85% Terrible
Read 19
Write 36
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 18
33% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.85%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 32.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 28.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING Builds (Compare 2,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $681
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback