Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Presario CQ50 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Wistron 360A
Memory	0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090818
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 22:57
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron SI-40 136 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket A, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Memory 82.3 1-Core 6.5 2-Core 9.3 30% 32.7 Pts	4-Core 16.6 8-Core 15.6 2% 16.1 Pts	64-Core 26.8 2% 26.8 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8200M G 1,369 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 360A) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.25% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.73 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.35 fps	MRender 0.76 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 0.52 0% 0.52 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.25% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9160827AS 160GB 1,041 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AHC SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 8 10 10 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 42.8 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 11.7 22% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 33%
Generic- Multi-Card 8GB 345 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 0158 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.5 4.6 4.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	4.42% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 5.2 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 4.3 10% 8.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.42% Great: 12%
Kingston DT 101 II 2GB 456 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1625 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 5.9 6.6 5.6 6.2 5.9 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	5.32% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 6.7 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 6.2 10% 9.1 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.32% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DRAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 0.2 5% 1.7 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 15%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon Dual-Core QL-60AMDBench 29%, 185 samples	5x
Turion Dual-Core RM-70AMDBench 28%, 164 samples	3x
Sempron SI-40AMDBench 27%, 136 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 8200M GNvidiaBench 0%, 1,369 samples	11x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	5x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples	1x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $14

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16