Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 920-$90 998 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 126 63% 99.3 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 251 28% 218 Pts	64-Core 253 16% 253 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800M 388 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Dell(1028 02EF) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.00 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.48% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 1.75 4% 3.77 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 3.52 3% 3.64 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.48% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM800 Series 2.5" 256GB 1,200 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 33 69 91 131 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 191 Write 9 Mixed 41.1 SusWrite 81 18% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 5.1 28% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 13.2 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 11.8 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 2800MNvidiaBench 5%, 1,135 samples	81x
FirePro M7740ATIBench 7%, 225 samples	46x
Quadro FX 3800MNvidiaBench 7%, 388 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x
MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,594 samples	7x
PM800 Series 2.5" 256GBSamsungBench 24%, 1,200 samples	5x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 4x2GBUnknownBench 38%, 37 samples	6x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 44%, 427 samples	6x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 318 samples	5x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $219

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16