Asrock K10N78

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock K10N78 (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100701
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '17 at 18:48
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150 5,211 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	49.3% Average	Memory 71.2 1-Core 46.3 2-Core 92.3 45% 69.9 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 168 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 3506) 1GB CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.19 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	3.63% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 3.66 4% 4.47 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.22 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.63% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Eaget S6 06 SSD 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.7 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.9% Average	Read 264 Write 192 Mixed 222 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 3.33 62% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 4.15 31% 72.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 44%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 339GB free Firmware: AX00 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 97.9 Write 99.4 Mixed 97.3 74% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K10N78 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Asrock K10N78

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	1x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+AMDBench 38%, 956 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x
GeForce 8200NvidiaBench 0%, 1,005 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock K10N78

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock K10N78

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)