Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon 3065 103 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 51.2 1-Core 16.4 2-Core 26.4 24% 31.3 Pts	4-Core 34.4 8-Core 42.7 5% 38.6 Pts	64-Core 41.6 3% 41.6 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 39 43 43 46 46 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.3% Below average	Read 129 Write 119 Mixed 127 SusWrite 44 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 22.5 70% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31.2 DQ Write 77.4 DQ Mixed 40.7 35% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 75%
GB0160CAABV 160GB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 148GB free Firmware: HPG1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 51 51 51 53 60 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 66.9 Write 30.2 Mixed 36.9 SusWrite 53.7 35% 46.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 43%
FB160C4081 160GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 127GB free Firmware: HPF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 61 62 62 64 68 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 52.6 Write 55.1 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 63.9 38% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.8 14% 5.07 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon 3065IntelBench 37%, 103 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x

RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16