Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	11.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	6.8 GB free of 11.7188 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '20 at 06:23
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS) 428 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Memory 55.1 1-Core 72.8 2-Core 73.4 43% 67.1 Pts	4-Core 71 8-Core 78.6 10% 74.8 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 99%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 193GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 169 100 412 169 504 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 497 Write 372 Mixed 600 SusWrite 241 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 7% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x11GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1 of 1 slots used 11GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 18.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 12.9 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16