Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101118
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateDec 29 '16 at 08:32
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 26,095,256 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
68% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 356
43% 332 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
Asus(1043 0348) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 20
18% 18.3 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 16.3
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.4% Above average
Read 263
Write 196
Mixed 212
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 16.3
81% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 64
68% 110 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
358GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 94.2
Write 64
Mixed 75.1
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.29
76% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
74GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 112
Write 136
Mixed 110
90% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.27
88% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 2TB
2TB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 172
Write 157
Mixed 77.1
164% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.21
81% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 802GB
746GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 119
Write 115
Mixed 74.3
128% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.18
75% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 12.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback