Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 61.6 1-Core 52 2-Core 75.6 41% 63.1 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 128 17% 127 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Wistron(17C0 10D9) 3.8GB Driver: Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 0.66 0% 2.02 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 118 98 80 71 36 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.7% Below average	Read 210 Write 175 Mixed 179 SusWrite 91.6 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 16.9 67% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 48.3 DQ Mixed 53.5 56% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.5% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.9 23% 8.1 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.5 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16