Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 7810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 7810 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150926
Uptime	20.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '19 at 20:28
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 294 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 85.6 2-Core 171 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 511 52% 421 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 362.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.8 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 21.2 19% 20.2 fps	MRender 23.7 Gravity 18.1 Splatting 16.4 16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM87 256GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 87 79 74 76 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 410 Write 139 Mixed 195 SusWrite 83.5 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 28.6 106% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 44.2 DQ Mixed 74.1 71% 117 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 114%
Samsung SM87 256GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 238GB free Firmware: 2D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 334 348 426 421 427 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 437 Write 407 Mixed 313 SusWrite 375 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 43.8 156% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 337 259% 351 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GB 1,961 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85.9% Excellent	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 39.3 MC Mixed 30 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	143x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	88x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	137x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	121x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	80x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	39x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	31x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	27x

RAM
HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 95%, 876 samples	82x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	62x
M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 963 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $62

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16