Novatech MBB-96004D

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Novatech MBB-96004D (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte A320M-H-CF
Memory	8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '19 at 19:20
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$120 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 105 2-Core 236 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 693 66% 546 Pts	64-Core 904 56% 904 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PNY(196E 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Lighting 66.1 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 63.6 54% 65.3 fps	MRender 70.1 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 65.3 55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 96 45 23 61 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 331 Write 322 Mixed 150 SusWrite 79.8 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 21.7 49% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 45.5 68% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 192GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 152 152 132 140 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 163 Write 150 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 148 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 203GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 26 29 24 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 13.8 Write 43.5 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 26.8 24% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 59%
WDC WD32 00BPVT-55JJ5T0 320GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 188GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 21 22 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 34.3 Write 27.2 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 21.7 33% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 19%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB 583 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 575GB free, PID 0105 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 22 22 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 11.5 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 22.5 27% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905713-008.A00G BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 12GB 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.3% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 16.9 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 19.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16