TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory122.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 22:41
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 66
2-Core 198
60% 111 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 769
70% 585 Pts
64-Core 1,588
98% 1,588 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 71.8%
 Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M6000
HP(103C 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 104
Parallax 100
81% 101 fps
MRender 83.9
Gravity 90.4
Splatting 82.4
70% 85.6 fps
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 76.9%
 Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN15ABHA 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6T3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 377 376 372 293 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 381
Mixed 343
SusWrite 349
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 32.6
126% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 250
212% 311 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 90.9%
 Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 207 206 207 202 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 176
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 206
124% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 120%
 Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 209 208 208 203 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 168
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 207
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 119%
 Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 38.5
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 99.6%
 Great: 131%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples133x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples117x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples101x
GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples151x
Quadro K4200Nvidia  $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples104x
Quadro K2200Nvidia  $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples94x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples53x
MTFDDAK512MBF-1A 512GBCrucialBench 89%, 258 samples48x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples38x
RAM
M393A2K40BB1-CRC 8x16GBSamsungBench 113%, 218 samples45x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples40x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples39x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback