Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '19 at 16:14
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 94.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 230
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 82.7
55% 72.7 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 55
51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 218 212 296 265 261 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.1% Above average
Read 198
Write 104
Mixed 245
SusWrite 248
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 22.3
81% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 115
117% 189 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
28GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 180 105 33 133 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 346
Write 214
Mixed 215
SusWrite 110
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 22.2
93% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 90.8
94% 155 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57%
Great: 100%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
18GB free
Firmware: 60AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 166 162 112 160 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 312
Write 191
Mixed 200
SusWrite 139
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 25.3
96% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 121
94% 129 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 85%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
97GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 62 65 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 75.3
Write 74.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 64.7
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 51%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
31GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.1 6.7 8.2 6.7 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Read 27.3
Write 5.8
Mixed 9
SusWrite 7.2
13% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
46% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 39%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
5GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8.1 8.3 8.5 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 20
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 8.4
26% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 20%
Toshiba External USB HDD 640GB
22GB free, PID a003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.1 7.9 8.3 8.4 8.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 29
Write 22.4
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 8.2
26% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 19%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
45GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.2 7.9 8.3 8.5 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 23.8
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 8.2
27% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 22%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
3GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.1 7.8 8.2 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 30
Write 22.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 8.2
26% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 9905403-410.A00LF 9905403-410.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback