bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	23.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Microsoft Virtual Machine
Memory	11.5 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170602
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '19 at 11:13
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 624 User benchmarks, average bench 48% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	45.8% Average	Memory 69.3 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 124 54% 88.8 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 135 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 137GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 39 35 41 43 48 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.1% Poor	Read 68.4 Write 61.5 Mixed 33.4 SusWrite 42 12% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 6.9 58% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 23.2 DQ Mixed 13.4 14% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 67%
Virtual HD 30GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 26GB free Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 22 23 19 19 17 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.3% Very poor	Read 65.1 Write 64.8 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 19.2 12% 53.3 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 13.8 45% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.7 DQ Write 32.6 DQ Mixed 32.1 24% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 66%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 129GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 116GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.1 4 3.6 2.9 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 40.8 Write 8.7 Mixed 9.1 SusWrite 2.9 11% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 81%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 129GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 115GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3 4.8 3.7 3.3 1.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 7.3 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 3.3 11% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 14GB 9,406 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 1024, 13312 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 17.8 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 13.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,033x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,575x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	938x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	377x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16