Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '19 at 09:57
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 174 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 372 47% 358 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 18.9 13% 16.3 fps	MRender 20.8 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 365GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 251 269 266 274 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 499 Write 81.8 Mixed 266 SusWrite 256 61% 276 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 13.5 79% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 81 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 2.1 46% 106 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.9% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 29.5 91% 32 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.7 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 136%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16