Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1620-$45 2,566 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Memory 74.4 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 56.2 40% 57 Pts	4-Core 94.2 8-Core 113 13% 103 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFC256GBSJ 256GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJFA0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 138 142 166 164 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 164 Write 153 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 152 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 7.1 32% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 26.8 24% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 49%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 390GB free Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 107 105 105 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 80.7 Write 107 Mixed 34 SusWrite 106 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 419GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 77 75 76 76 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 75.9 Write 102 Mixed 32 SusWrite 76.7 97% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 EE63I1B08233Z Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 EE63I1B08233Z 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.5% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 12.8 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 12.6 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 91.7 44% 91.7 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16