Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 6,024 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 194 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 574 56% 457 Pts	64-Core 573 36% 573 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro M2000M 5,864 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 19.5 18% 19.3 fps	MRender 23.9 Gravity 21.7 Splatting 16.4 16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 17%
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake) 5,499 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	6.3% Terrible	Lighting 6.43 Reflection 9.31 Parallax 6.56 5% 7.43 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 13 8% 9.86 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.3% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 376GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 358 412 400 414 420 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 472 Write 424 Mixed 364 SusWrite 384 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 71 4K Mixed 44.4 144% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 34 DQ Write 72.3 DQ Mixed 44.7 36% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$89 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 310GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 362 415 401 419 420 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 424 Mixed 366 SusWrite 386 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 43.5 146% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 72.1 DQ Mixed 240 130% 116 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 133%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 165 178 171 179 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 146 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 169 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 4x16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.8% Very good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 23.3 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 22.1 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1505M v5IntelBench 66%, 6,024 samples	50x

GPU
Quadro M2000MNvidiaBench 16%, 5,864 samples	28x
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples	21x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x

SSD
SD8TN8U256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 72%, 1,739 samples	5x
MZNLN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,407 samples	5x
TM8FP8002T 2TBT-forceBench 205%, 870 samples	3x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	8x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G1A1 1x16GBMicronBench 38%, 430 samples	4x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 38%, 4,427 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16