Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	6.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Ð¦Ð²ÐµÑÐ°: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '15 at 07:58
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3225-$325 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 59% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 90.6 2-Core 152 57% 122 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 248 34% 254 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gainward(10B0 0401) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4144 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	6.9% Terrible	Lighting 9.3 Reflection 9.38 Parallax 3.22 8% 7.3 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 6.67 Splatting 6.22 6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.9% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-512M6S 2.5 7mm 512GB 1,038 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC9110E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 86 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 6179 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2944 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 83558 (F2) Unknown 100 100 48990	57.7% Above average	Read 331 Write 305 Mixed 316 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 17.1 78% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 75 DQ Mixed 18.7 24% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 88GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 170 2316 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1670 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5368 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 895 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 20 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1649 (C2) HDA temperature 102 90 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	80.6% Excellent	Read 139 Write 142 Mixed 93.4 93% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.59 4K Mixed 0.23 102% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 109%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 29GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 73 (03) Spinup time 163 161 4833 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9938 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25450 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4384 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 269 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9939 (C2) HDA temperature 105 89 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 173 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 178 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 187 0	29.3% Poor	Read 63.7 Write 38.1 Mixed 16.2 29% 39.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.27 82% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	389x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	205x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	132x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $902

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)