TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 00YJ423

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardLenovo 00YJ423  (all builds)
Memory60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151217
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 21:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
Socket 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Memory 5.17
1-Core 10.4
2-Core 17.7
6% 11.1 Pts
4-Core 41.3
8-Core 77.9
7% 59.6 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 6.45%
 Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5210 119GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 188 186 144 165 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
Read 286
Write 210
Mixed 215
SusWrite 175
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 18
61% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 111
83% 109 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 45.9%
 Great: 75%
IBM ServeRAID M5210 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 12 15 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 22.4
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 451
9% 451 ns
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 43.7%
 Great: 124%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback