bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory120GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 120GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory116.8 GB free of 120 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 793 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 04:34
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6174
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 48.2
1-Core 31.8
2-Core 63
30% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 262
23% 196 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 81GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.7% Very poor
Read 94.8
Write 83.3
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 17.2
16% 73 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 9
33% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 161
106% 126 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 91%
Virtual Disk 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 501 495 495 493 500 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
Read 858
Write 500
Mixed 605
SusWrite 497
137% 615 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 33.1
108% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 175
130% 173 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 4.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 95.1
Write 92.7
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 30.6
57% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 3.5
655% 4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 62%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 2.5TB
833GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 32% Great: 54%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 1TB
178GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 31 32 32 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 120GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.3% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback