| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD |
| Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150828 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 31 '19 at 21:28 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.5%
Very good
|
74% 129 Pts
|
55% 454 Pts
|
36% 587 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
25.2%
Poor
|
26% 32.3 fps
|
24% 28.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
539GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 120 92 106 105 MB/s
|
49%
Average
|
51% 69.8 MB/s
|
118% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Generic- Multiple Reader 16GB
3GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.2 MB/s
|
5.17%
Terrible
|
10% 8.82 MB/s
|
14% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.3%
Very good
|
73% 25.5 GB/s
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
55% 72.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,491 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 681x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 541x |
| Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples | 101x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 206x |
| GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 106x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $107 |