Lenovo 60072

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 60072  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1200 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140801
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 25 '16 at 13:41
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3745
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 17.6
2-Core 35.3
26% 36.2 Pts
4-Core 69.9
8-Core 69.5
9% 69.7 Pts
64-Core 69.1
4% 69.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.88
1% 0.92 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.21 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.11
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
Read 158
Write 76.4
Mixed 105
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 3.71
38% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13.5
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 3.68
6% 10.5 MB/s
Generic 00000 SD Card 63GB
31GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 22.6
Write 15
Mixed 19
14% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.51
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 1.82
472% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback