bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110419
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '19 at 14:30
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 95.5
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 169
71% 117 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 437
43% 353 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
Sapphire(174B 6000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.62 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 422 429 422 421 388 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 432
Mixed 420
SusWrite 417
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 37.4
121% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 235
181% 252 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 500GB
407GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 163 165 166 166 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 354
Write 292
Mixed 305
SusWrite 166
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 19.6
64% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 88.8
67% 90.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 77%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 1TB
19GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 163 165 166 167 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 345
Write 288
Mixed 296
SusWrite 166
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 19.1
64% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 94.2
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 101
72% 92 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 79%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
167GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 34 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 15.2
Write 32.8
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 34.4
23% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 13 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 12.7
4% 5.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
5.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 143 148 158 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 110
Mixed 29
SusWrite 156
132% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D5A31364758334D344131363030433920 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback