Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H87-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130509
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '19 at 03:49
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 166 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 337 47% 348 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.6% Above average	Lighting 70.8 Reflection 71.5 Parallax 70.6 58% 71 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 66.6 Splatting 65.7 54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT09B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 35 36 39 38 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 309 Write 40.5 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 37.1 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 9.5 57% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 21 DQ Mixed 35.4 48% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 73%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB 6,787 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 75GB free Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 108 97 102 93 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 75 Write 81.3 Mixed 54 SusWrite 97.6 57% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBXL Kingston 9905471-014.A00LF 0420 F3-10666CL9-4GBXL Kingston 9905471-014.A00LF 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.7% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 13.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 11.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H87-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	151x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	70x
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	56x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	19x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $169

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16