| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110518 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 17 '16 at 10:00 |
| Run Duration | 531 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
56.9%
Above average
|
60% 99.2 Pts
|
31% 229 Pts
|
18% 294 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 8390) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5330
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
17% 21 fps
|
17% 20.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
40% 55.2 MB/s
|
66% 0.48 MB/s
| |
|
|
30.9%
Below average
|
40% 53.5 MB/s
|
77% 0.6 MB/s
| |
|
General UDisk 268GB
210GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
1.71%
Terrible
|
4% 4.16 MB/s
|
4% 0.32 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
45%
Average
|
47% 16.3 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
44% 91.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z68 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 184 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 - $150
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 70x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 49x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 21x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 22x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
| HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)Intel $15Bench 2%, 6,831 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $628 |