Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151215
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 15 '18 at 18:59
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 99
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 323
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3530) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.01 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.64 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 289 281 292 291 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 392
Write 294
Mixed 227
SusWrite 289
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 27.6
108% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 237
205% 303 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
202GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 106 87 84 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 289
Write 129
Mixed 166
SusWrite 97.8
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 24.2
77% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 113
98% 149 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 116%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
535GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 46 37 45 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 56.5
Write 79.8
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 45
38% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
89% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 100 113 125 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 114
Write 61.5
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 113
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 100%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 31 34 70 70 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 138
Write 116
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 51.1
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 99%
Sony PRS-T2 1GB
1GB free, PID 05c2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 7.2 6.8 6.8 6.4 6.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.56% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 10.7
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 6.8
17% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
82% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $650
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback