Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S3 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2119
Memory	9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '16 at 14:25
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.73GHz 70 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 52.9 1-Core 35.6 2-Core 58 32% 48.8 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 168 17% 138 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MegaRAID SAS RMB 293GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.12 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	123% Outstanding	Read 709 Write 621 Mixed 628 146% 653 MB/s	4K Read 57.7 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 43.8 167% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 66.9 66% 106 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 123%
LSI MegaRAID SAS RMB 119GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 111GB free Firmware: 1.12 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	119% Outstanding	Read 663 Write 611 Mixed 542 135% 605 MB/s	4K Read 54.7 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 40.7 163% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 60.8 63% 102 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 5 14% 4.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16