HP Z200 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Z200 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B40h
Memory4.8 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100506
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 01:50
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3460
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 163
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 294
39% 294 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 1.66
4% 4.54 fps
MRender 7.14
Gravity 3.47
Splatting 4.39
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 217 220 216 218 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.6% Good
Read 225
Write 221
Mixed 217
SusWrite 210
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 26.6
97% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
39GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 18 19 20 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Read 28.7
Write 18.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 17.8
28% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
35% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback