Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '18 at 01:51
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 674
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 38.2
38% 38.8 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 36.5
32% 39 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2449
Write 1469
Mixed 1,282
382% 1,733 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 78
265% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 926
676% 885 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
53GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,709
Write 6,555
Mixed 6,994
1,649% 7,419 MB/s
4K Read 754
4K Write 262
4K Mixed 330
1,703% 449 MB/s
DQ Read 1,644
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 1,038
812% 1143 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 144 146 147 146 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 109
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 144
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
79GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 37.1
Write 39
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 39.9
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 45%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 170 169 170 172 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 126
Write 135
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 171
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.8
338% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2608 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 27.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 24.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback