Asus X75VC

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus X75VC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X75VC
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130605
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '18 at 12:03
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 84.8 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 116 57% 89.6 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 162 18% 144 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 2.72 3% 3.99 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.61 4% 4.82 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB 3,514 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 150 150 149 150 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 442 Write 339 Mixed 243 SusWrite 166 66% 298 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 30.1 95% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 37.3 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 51.3 59% 95.3 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 115%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 474GB free Firmware: AX0R2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 92.5 Write 17.5 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 17.6 28% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264HZ-1G6D 1 Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.4% Average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.6 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 11.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X75VC Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VC

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	92x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	57x
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	179x
GeForce GT 720MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,823 samples	43x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x

SSD
RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GBKingstonBench 61%, 337 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	6x

RAM
8JTF51264HZ-1G6D 1 1x4GBMicronBench 30%, 475 samples	45x
1x4GBElpidaBench 28%, 3,874 samples	19x
8JTF51264HZ-1G6D 1 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GBMicronBench 49%, 130 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16