Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180208
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '18 at 22:29
Run Duration	317 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 71.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 206 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 539 59% 465 Pts	64-Core 545 34% 545 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 1016) 1GB CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 17.6 Reflection 16 Parallax 21.5 14% 18.4 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 21.5 Splatting 15.2 16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: CA12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 100 180793310 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 12 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 601201 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 6 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 61 656212004 (C2) HDA temperature 36 40 94489280548 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 58 58 180793310 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56% Above average	Read 94.5 Write 100 Mixed 95.2 73% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.37 90% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB 5,405 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 15.5 Write 3.46 Mixed 5.42 8% 8.12 MB/s	4K Read 6.07 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 1.62 148% 3.25 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C16 Series 1x8GB 1,282 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 15.4 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 97.7 41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 56%

Gunboat

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	11x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	28x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	12x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $443

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16