Alware ALIENWRE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlware ALIENWRE  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110325
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJun 22 '18 at 23:22
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2617M
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 49.3
37% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 70
8-Core 93.8
10% 81.9 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 256GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 248
Write 214
Mixed 210
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 8.78
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 7.42
36% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 38.3
DQ Mixed 9.79
24% 51.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 55%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
175GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 80.9
Write 73.8
Mixed 4.42
60% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 5.91
4K Mixed 0.35
216% 2.36 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback