bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory31.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory27.8 GB free of 31.25 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '18 at 05:42
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X7560
None, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.2% Below average
Memory 61
1-Core 28.6
2-Core 78.8
36% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 85.9
8-Core 128
13% 107 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 54GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 428
Write 413
Mixed 426
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 2.43
33% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 9.37
43% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 31GB
null MHz
3968, 28032 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.1
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback