Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Stealth  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160415
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 17 '18 at 02:04
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
CPU Throttled 96%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 130
54% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 221
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 97.9
Reflection 102
Parallax 91.9
80% 97.1 fps
MRender 89.5
Gravity 89.6
Splatting 89.3
73% 89.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV512 512GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,420
Write 367
Mixed 574
171% 787 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 18.7
122% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 24.7
47% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 120%
Great: 173%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 151
Write 120
Mixed 92.9
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 6.92
4K Mixed 0.46
211% 2.71 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 94%
Sony Card_R/W 8GB
7GB free, PID 03cc
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 5.99
Mixed 5.36
8% 7.18 MB/s
4K Read 2.78
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.02
12% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 21.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback