PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock N68-GS4 FX (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150408 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | May 20 '18 at 16:33 |
Run Duration | 93 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4320 Quad-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
49.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1433 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
92.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 1066 MHz
|
27.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 38x |
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 26x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 20x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 7x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $167 |