Asrock J4105B-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock J4105B-ITX (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '18 at 08:25
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 43.4 1-Core 52.5 2-Core 105 38% 66.9 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 204 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4843 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.32% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 2.34 2% 2.64 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.32% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 0 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 27 (94) Unknown 100 100 0 (95) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 8 (AA) Unknown 100 100 9 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 22 (C2) HDA temperature 60 58 180390002728 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 0 0 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 102 (F2) Unknown 100 100 65 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (F5) Unknown 100 100 2 (F6) Unknown 100 100 5016	41.2% Average	Read 265 Write 200 Mixed 283 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 3.9 59% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 19 DQ Write 73.8 DQ Mixed 3.99 15% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 85%
Intenso Speed Line 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 0916 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	7.66% Terrible	Read 31.5 Write 5.53 Mixed 8.1 14% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.86 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 30% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.66% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.C8FAD 1x4GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical J4105B-ITX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105B-ITX

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $42Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples	1x
128GB 128GBIntensoBench 66%, 1,805 samples	1x

RAM
CT4G4SFS824A.M8FG 2x4GBCrucialBench 69%, 62 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 322 samples	1x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 39%, 1,390 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16