Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '18 at 10:59
Run Duration	470 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 1,402 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 48.6 1-Core 57.6 2-Core 115 42% 73.7 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 436 39% 332 Pts	64-Core 1,007 62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.3% Very good	Lighting 65.7 Reflection 86.8 Parallax 186 54% 113 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 169 Splatting 123 112% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2310 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 102 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 58 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 50446943833	53.1% Above average	Read 264 Write 211 Mixed 206 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 20.3 88% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 36.3 DQ Mixed 18.6 28% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 135%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 39GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18724 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1515 (B1) Unknown 90 90 337 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 59 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 36 (F1) Unknown 99 99 91327909709	78% Very good	Read 481 Write 479 Mixed 447 105% 469 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 19.5 83% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 41 DQ Mixed 19.2 35% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 116%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 584GB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 77 64 53188192 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1335 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 86160438 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 127006477912567 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 126 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 19 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 65 488177693 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 642 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6066 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 38654705693 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -41867341200630 (F1) Unknown 100 253 42219299734 (F2) Unknown 100 253 45891913294	97.6% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 175 Mixed 104 110% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.23 84% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 396GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 162 158 6883 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4237 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7788 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 152 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 15 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 180 180 60603 (C2) HDA temperature 120 109 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	74.5% Very good	Read 129 Write 131 Mixed 111 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.26 96% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 101%
JMicron Generic 2TB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 148 Write 158 Mixed 106 174% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.31 48% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 222%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 27GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 21.5 Mixed 24.7 31% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.38 4K Write 3.05 4K Mixed 1.42 168% 2.95 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK M378B1G73EB0-CK M378B1G73QH0-CK M378B1G73EB0-CK M378B1G73QH0-CK M378B1G73EB0-CK M378B1G73QH0-CK M378B1G73EB0-CK 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80% Very good	MC Read 40 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 33.5 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16