Asus V-M3N8200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus V-M3N8200 (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080718
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 13 '18 at 18:24
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core 221 User benchmarks, average bench 36% AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Memory 40.4 1-Core 29 2-Core 51.2 26% 40.2 Pts	4-Core 45.8 8-Core 52.1 6% 48.9 Pts	64-Core 53.9 3% 53.9 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8200 1,005 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 82F2) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.49 fps	MRender 0.81 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 0.57 0% 0.54 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 298GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 98 223272969 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 184 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 55 55 94496110484 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 147 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 155 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 47 808058928 (C2) HDA temperature 48 53 51539607600 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 65 57 34348779 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 80 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	42% Average	Read 73.2 Write 72.8 Mixed 69.6 54% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.41 106% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 43%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$26 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 125GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 158 154 3066 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2247 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3935 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1169 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 313 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2247 (C2) HDA temperature 94 92 49 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 30578 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.8% Below average	Read 68.7 Write 62.6 Mixed 64.2 49% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.33 93% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 59%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: VT100-53 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (03) Spinup time 253 253 5824 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4322 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3265 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2217 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 97 91 47 (C2) HDA temperature 97 91 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 22248547 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	25.7% Poor	Read 45.3 Write 44.4 Mixed 48.3 35% 46 MB/s	4K Read 0.16 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical V-M3N8200 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus V-M3N8200

CPU
Processor model unknownAMDBench 48%, 429 samples	1x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	1x
Athlon II X2 245AMDBench 41%, 6,247 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples	1x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	1x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	1x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16