Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP hp workstation xw8200 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 08B4h
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060531
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '18 at 02:31
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	ALB-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz 46 User benchmarks, average bench 33% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Memory 55.4 1-Core 27.9 2-Core 50.8 30% 44.7 Pts	4-Core 55.5 8-Core 43.6 7% 49.5 Pts	64-Core 53.1 3% 53.1 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% PNY(196E 0643) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.09% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 0.81 2% 2.58 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.84 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.09% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.43 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 60 48 68612739 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3128 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 742973224 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11625 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3431 (C2) HDA temperature 37 50 12884901925 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 60 48 68612739 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	28.3% Poor	Read 48.9 Write 49.6 Mixed 23.6 30% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.36 69% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 31%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 456GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 28 Write 23.6 Mixed 17.9 28% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 49GB 1,461 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.81% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.1 SC Mixed 2.2 5% 1.67 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.81% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 31%, 33 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 31%, 48 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.80GHz1stBench 33%, 11 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
CV3-CE128-11 SATA 128GBLiteonBench 68%, 643 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16