| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
| Memory | 0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110609 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 13 '18 at 14:59 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | KAZ-User |
| Background CPU | 50% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.7%
Average
|
53% 85.1 Pts
|
15% 110 Pts
|
8% 126 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
0.93%
Terrible
|
1% 1.04 fps
|
1% 1.36 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
66.8%
Good
|
73% 333 MB/s
|
73% 21 MB/s
|
65% 114 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.9%
Poor
|
19% 6.8 GB/s
|
12% 4.17 GB/s
|
48% 84.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,259 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1,668x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 553x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 545x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,776x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 275x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 238x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |